Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261355AbVCTXfq (ORCPT ); Sun, 20 Mar 2005 18:35:46 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261388AbVCTXfp (ORCPT ); Sun, 20 Mar 2005 18:35:45 -0500 Received: from fire.osdl.org ([65.172.181.4]:57046 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261355AbVCTXfa (ORCPT ); Sun, 20 Mar 2005 18:35:30 -0500 Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2005 15:34:46 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: "Chen, Kenneth W" Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, christoph@graphe.net Subject: Re: [patch] del_timer_sync scalability patch Message-Id: <20050320153446.32a9215a.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <200503202319.j2KNJXg29946@unix-os.sc.intel.com> References: <200503202319.j2KNJXg29946@unix-os.sc.intel.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.7 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 821 Lines: 24 "Chen, Kenneth W" wrote: > > We did exactly the same thing about 10 months back. Nice to > see that independent people came up with exactly the same > solution that we proposed 10 months back. Well the same question applies. Christoph, which code is calling del_timer_sync() so often that you noticed? > In fact, this patch > is line-by-line identical to the one we post. I assume that's not a coincidence. > Hope Andrew is going to take the patch this time. Hope Kenneth is going to test the alternate del_timer_sync patches in next -mm ;) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/