Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261947AbVCUWx0 (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Mar 2005 17:53:26 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262128AbVCUWvX (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Mar 2005 17:51:23 -0500 Received: from sta.galis.org ([66.250.170.210]:41360 "HELO sta.galis.org") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S261947AbVCUWsQ (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Mar 2005 17:48:16 -0500 From: "George Georgalis" Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2005 17:48:15 -0500 To: Andrew Morton Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Paul Jarc Subject: Re: problem with linux 2.6.11 and sa Message-ID: <20050321224815.GA4041@ixeon.local> References: <20050303173459.GC952@ixeon.local> <20050321142555.47b1e5a1.akpm@osdl.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050321142555.47b1e5a1.akpm@osdl.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2744 Lines: 69 On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 02:25:55PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: >"George Georgalis" wrote: >> >> I'm very defiantly seeing a problem with the 2.6.11 >> kernel and my spamassassin setup. However, it's not >> clear exactly where the problem is, seems like sa >> but it might be 2.6.11 with daemontools + qmail + >> QMAIL_QUEUE. >> >> A sure sign of it is no logs (with debug) for >> remote sa connections which score "0/0" and correct >> operation with local "cat spam.txt | spamc -R"; fix >> is to use the older kernel. >> >> SA has stopped stdout logging completely with 2.6.11 >> in addition to the all pass score. But the message >> seems to go through my temp queue (for testing) and >> sent on to my local MDA. I'm not sure if it's a sa >> problem with the kernel or the new kernel doing >> something new with pipes from tcp connections. >> Maybe the new kernel is not making files available >> (eg 0 bytes), until the writing pipe is closed? >> That would make my SA test a zero byte file, which >> would pass, close, become full, and the file piped >> to local MDA is full? ...humm then I'd get a score >> of "0/5"... this sounds like a SA problem with the >> new kernel, ideas? > >George, did you end up getting to the bottom of this? I'd be suspecting a >bug in the new pipe code, or an application bug which was triggered by the >new pipe code. Hi! No resolution, I've been overloaded on a work related project. The best I can say is no problem noticed with 2.6.8.1, 2.6.10 works for smtp code below but fails mplayer commands; 2.6.11 failed smtp code, didn't test mplayer on 2.6.11 and haven't tried any newer kernels. while read file; do mplayer $file ; done