Message-ID: <423F507B.1090009@tuxrocks.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2005 15:53:47 -0700
From: Frank Sorenson <frank@tuxrocks.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041206)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Dmitry Torokhov <dtor_core@ameritech.net>
CC: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] I8K driver facelift
References: <200502240110.16521.dtor_core@ameritech.net> <200503170140.49328.dtor_core@ameritech.net> <423951E3.6070804@tuxrocks.com> <200503210012.29477.dtor_core@ameritech.net>
In-Reply-To: <200503210012.29477.dtor_core@ameritech.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1265
Lines: 35

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> I have implemented arrays of groups of attributes:

Works great here.  The i8k-cumulative patch claimed to be malformed, but
I merged it in just fine by hand.  In arch/i386/kernel/dmi_scan.c, I had
to EXPORT dmi_get_system_info in order to get the i8k module to load.
That may have been a mistake on my end (lots of odd patches in my tree
right now).  I'm a little curious to see how many people are going to
find they need the ignore_dmi flag versus working without it.

Everything works great, and it is a big step up from the existing code.
 I say lets go with it.

Frank
- --
Frank Sorenson - KD7TZK
Systems Manager, Computer Science Department
Brigham Young University
frank@tuxrocks.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFCP1B7aI0dwg4A47wRAufNAJ9tJODed2rcndtytGCZbJHr5AQJPgCgqbA1
zWnRrePRdJ/+5K1yu5HM3jg=
=OzaL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/