Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262532AbVCVDKX (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Mar 2005 22:10:23 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262281AbVCVCom (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Mar 2005 21:44:42 -0500 Received: from gprs189-60.eurotel.cz ([160.218.189.60]:22449 "EHLO amd.ucw.cz") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262328AbVCVCHy (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Mar 2005 21:07:54 -0500 Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 03:07:38 +0100 From: Pavel Machek To: Andrew Morton Cc: rjw@sisk.pl, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, len.brown@intel.com Subject: Re: 2.6.12-rc1-mm1: Kernel BUG at pci:389 Message-ID: <20050322020738.GA1628@elf.ucw.cz> References: <20050321025159.1cabd62e.akpm@osdl.org> <200503212343.31665.rjw@sisk.pl> <20050321160306.2f7221ec.akpm@osdl.org> <20050322004456.GB1372@elf.ucw.cz> <20050321170623.4eabc7f8.akpm@osdl.org> <20050322013535.GA1421@elf.ucw.cz> <20050321175232.34d93a13.akpm@osdl.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050321175232.34d93a13.akpm@osdl.org> X-Warning: Reading this can be dangerous to your mental health. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1603 Lines: 36 On Po 21-03-05 17:52:32, Andrew Morton wrote: > Pavel Machek wrote: > > > > > Could I suggest that you prepare a fixup against 2.6.12-rc1-mm1 and send > > > that to Len and myself? If that fixup is not suitable for a 2.6.12-rc1 > > > based tree then I can look after it until things get flushed out. > > > > Could you just revert those two patches? First one is very > > wrong. Second one might be fixed, but... See comments below. > > I could revert them locally, but that wouldn't gain us much. You mean that Len has to revert them or revert is "ineffective"? > Greg hasn't taken the pm_message_t patches yet. Perhaps that's for the best. > > Perhaps I should just jam everything-from-Pavel into Linus's tree as soon > as he returns and then we can fix up the downstream fallout in the various > bk trees? Yes, that would help a lot. I was waiting with "turn-pm_message_t-into-struct" until all pm_message_t patches reached Linus so that there's not a mess "in flight". Len's patch pretty much depends on pm_message_t already being converted... (and I'd prefer it to wait a while, so we can see which problems were introduced by conversion and which are due to ACPI BIOS bugs). Pavel -- People were complaining that M$ turns users into beta-testers... ...jr ghea gurz vagb qrirybcref, naq gurl frrz gb yvxr vg gung jnl! - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/