Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262535AbVCVDNH (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Mar 2005 22:13:07 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262241AbVCVDKn (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Mar 2005 22:10:43 -0500 Received: from fire.osdl.org ([65.172.181.4]:26540 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262540AbVCVDFR (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Mar 2005 22:05:17 -0500 Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2005 19:04:36 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: Josh Boyer Cc: pavel@suse.cz, phillip@lougher.demon.co.uk, pmarques@grupopie.com, greg@kroah.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH][2/2] SquashFS Message-Id: <20050321190436.28f76a65.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <1111459265.20190.15.camel@windu.rchland.ibm.com> References: <20050314170653.1ed105eb.akpm@osdl.org> <20050314190140.5496221b.akpm@osdl.org> <423727BD.7080200@grupopie.com> <20050321101441.GA23456@elf.ucw.cz> <423EEEC2.9060102@lougher.demon.co.uk> <20050321190044.GD1390@elf.ucw.cz> <423F0C67.6000006@lougher.demon.co.uk> <20050321224937.GQ1390@elf.ucw.cz> <1111459265.20190.15.camel@windu.rchland.ibm.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.7 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1284 Lines: 27 Josh Boyer wrote: > > This is a useful, stable, and _maintained_ filesystem and I'm a bit > surprised that there is this much resistance to it's inclusion. Although I've only been following things with half an eye, I don't think there's a lot of resistance. It's just that squashfs's proponents are being asked to explain the reasons why the kernel needs this filesystem. That's something into which no effort was made in the initial patch release (there's a lesson there). Hopefully when the patches are reissued, all of these concerns will be described and addressed within the covering email. AFAICT the most substantial issue is the 4GB filesytem limit, and it seems that the answer there is "this fs is for embedded systems and 4GB is already insanely large". If that is indeed the argument then please, make that argument and we'll dutifully evaluate it. We shouldn't have to drag out such important and relevant information with torture-via-email-thread. You guys are the squashfs exports. Tell us stuff. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/