Subject: Re: [ACPI] Re: Fw: Anybody? 2.6.11 (stable and -rc) ACPI breaks USB
From: Li Shaohua <shaohua.li@intel.com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>
Cc: Grzegorz Kulewski <kangur@polcom.net>,
       Zwane Mwaikambo <zwane@arm.linux.org.uk>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
       ACPI List <acpi-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>,
       lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
In-Reply-To: <41062.15.99.19.46.1111525073.squirrel@mail.atl.hp.com>
References: <41062.15.99.19.46.1111525073.squirrel@mail.atl.hp.com>
Content-Type: text/plain
Message-Id: <1111539249.18927.17.camel@sli10-desk.sh.intel.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2005 08:54:09 +0800
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1115
Lines: 29

On Wed, 2005-03-23 at 04:57, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > Your patch applied with some problems:
> >
> > patching file arch/i386/pci/irq.c
> > Hunk #2 succeeded at 1081 with fuzz 2 (offset 1 line).
> > patching file drivers/acpi/pci_irq.c
> > patching file drivers/pci/quirks.c
> > Hunk #1 succeeded at 678 (offset -5 lines).
> 
> These indicate minor differences in these files between upstream BK
> (which is what my patch was against) and the kernel you're building.
> You can ignore them.
> 
> > Then I tested it and it works (at least my speedtouch still works).
> 
> Great.  Shaohua, where should we go from here?  Do you have more
> concerns with the current patch, or should we ask Andrew to put it
> in -mm?  If you do have concerns, would you like to propose an
> alternate patch that fixes the problem for Grzegorz?
No, the patch is great to me.

Thanks,
Shaohua

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/