Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2005 19:33:30 +0100
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>
To: Mark Seger <Mark.Seger@hp.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Patch for inconsistent recording of block device statistics
Message-ID: <20050323183329.GG16149@suse.de>
References: <42409313.1010308@hp.com> <20050323091916.GO24105@suse.de> <42417FE3.2090506@hp.com> <20050323155150.GE16149@suse.de> <4241B407.4070700@hp.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4241B407.4070700@hp.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1107
Lines: 30

On Wed, Mar 23 2005, Mark Seger wrote:
> 
> >>re: your patch - I did try it on both an Operton and Xeon box.  It 
> >>worked find on the Opeteron and reported 0 for all the sectors on the 
> >>Xeon.  If nothing immediately jumps to your mind could it have been 
> >>something I did wrong?  I'll try another build after I send this along, 
> >>but I don't see how that will help as I did the first one from a brand 
> >>new source kit.
> >>   
> >>
> >
> >Sounds very strange, it is generic code so should work for all.
> >Different storage?
> > 
> >
> Works fine now.  Obviously I screwed up something and just wanted to let 
> you know it was cockpit error on my end.
> Is your plan to move this into some future kernel?  Do you need anything 
> more from me at this point?

Yes, I will make sure it gets committed. Thanks for your help so far.

-- 
Jens Axboe

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/