Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262422AbVCXH2J (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Mar 2005 02:28:09 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263075AbVCXH2J (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Mar 2005 02:28:09 -0500 Received: from mail.kroah.org ([69.55.234.183]:51842 "EHLO perch.kroah.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262422AbVCXH2F (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Mar 2005 02:28:05 -0500 Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2005 23:25:51 -0800 From: Greg KH To: Dmitry Torokhov Cc: Frank Sorenson , LKML , Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] I8K driver facelift Message-ID: <20050324072550.GL10604@kroah.com> References: <200502240110.16521.dtor_core@ameritech.net> <4233B65A.4030302@tuxrocks.com> <4238A76A.3040408@tuxrocks.com> <200503170140.49328.dtor_core@ameritech.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200503170140.49328.dtor_core@ameritech.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1461 Lines: 32 On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 01:40:48AM -0500, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > On Wednesday 16 March 2005 16:38, Frank Sorenson wrote: > > Okay, I replaced the sysfs_ops with ops of my own, and now all the show > > and store functions also accept the name of the attribute as a parameter. > > This lets the functions know what attribute is being accessed, and allows > > us to create attributes that share show and store functions, so things > > don't need to be defined at compile time (I feel slightly evil!). > > Hrm, can we be a little more explicit and not poke in the sysfs guts right > in the driver? What do you think about the patch below athat implements > "attribute arrays"? And I am attaching cumulative i8k patch using these > arrays so they can be tested. > > I am CC-ing Greg to see what he thinks about it. Hm, I think it's proably of limited use, right? What other code would want this (the i2c sensor code doesn't, as it's naming scheme is different.) What drivers _do_ want is a way to create attributes on the fly easily, and be able to have a "private" pointer to determine easier what file was opened (to allow a single file handler, instead of the current one-per-attribute type). thanks, greg k-h - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/