Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261550AbVCXQaX (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Mar 2005 11:30:23 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262628AbVCXQaX (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Mar 2005 11:30:23 -0500 Received: from perpugilliam.csclub.uwaterloo.ca ([129.97.134.31]:44244 "EHLO perpugilliam.csclub.uwaterloo.ca") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261550AbVCXQaR (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Mar 2005 11:30:17 -0500 Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2005 11:29:46 -0500 To: Asfand Yar Qazi Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: How's the nforce4 support in Linux? Message-ID: <20050324162946.GK17865@csclub.uwaterloo.ca> References: <3LwFC-4Ko-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <3LwYW-4Xx-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <3LwYZ-4Xx-25@gated-at.bofh.it> <42428FCE.7070901@qazi.f2s.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <42428FCE.7070901@qazi.f2s.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i From: lsorense@csclub.uwaterloo.ca (Lennart Sorensen) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1494 Lines: 34 On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 10:00:46AM +0000, Asfand Yar Qazi wrote: > http://www.neoseeker.com/Articles/Hardware/Previews/nvnforce4/3.html > > You're right there - some semi-hardware support combined with drivers > apparently result in lower CPU usage that software firewalls. Apparently. > > Actually, these people like it: > http://www.bjorn3d.com/read.php?cID=712&pageID=1096 > > However one feature that you can't laugh at is the fact that it can be > made to block packets in the span of time between the OS being loaded > up, and the "real" firewall coming up. This small time span > theoretically leaves the PC vulnerable, so I think this is the only > use for "ActiveAmor Firewall". Until the OS loads network drivers AND configures IP support AND starts accepting packets in, there is nothing for the firewall to do. Certainly on Linux I can make sure iptables is populated (or least has a sane policy set) before I bring up networking. In other words: "Who cares". > However, this doesn't answer my original question (which I suppose I > should have made clearer): can I get SATA II NCQ support in Linux with > an nForce 4 chipset? Don't know. I think 3ware's controllers do their own NCQ, which is pretty neat. Len Sorensen - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/