Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261721AbVCYSQI (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Mar 2005 13:16:08 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261722AbVCYSQI (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Mar 2005 13:16:08 -0500 Received: from atlrel7.hp.com ([156.153.255.213]:50621 "EHLO atlrel7.hp.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261721AbVCYSQE (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Mar 2005 13:16:04 -0500 From: Bjorn Helgaas To: Michael Tokarev Subject: Re: Interesting tidbit: NetMos 9835 card, IRQ, and ACPI Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2005 11:15:56 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2 Cc: Russell King , Kernel Mailing List References: <42430EAD.3050605@tls.msk.ru> <20050324191654.D4189@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> <42431B0A.2000407@tls.msk.ru> In-Reply-To: <42431B0A.2000407@tls.msk.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200503251115.56413.bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1454 Lines: 32 On Thursday 24 March 2005 12:54 pm, Michael Tokarev wrote: > Serial: 8250/16550 driver $Revision: 1.90 $ 8 ports, IRQ sharing enabled > ttyS0 at I/O 0x3f8 (irq = 4) is a 16550A > ACPI: PCI interrupt 0000:01:00.0[A] -> GSI 18 (level, low) -> IRQ 193 > ttyS4 at I/O 0xa400 (irq = 193) is a 16550A > ttyS5 at I/O 0xa000 (irq = 193) is a 16550A > > And oh.. now the ports are at ttyS[45], I used for them > to be at ttyS[23]... Oh well... Someday maybe we should make serial rely on PNP, and only use the compiled-in table when PNP isn't available or is turned off. Then ports would just be numbered sequentially as they're discovered. And it would also help with the current situation where ttyS0/1 are often discovered two or three times. > The patch does not apply to 2.6.11 - several hunks, notable > all the parport stuff, fails. I'll dig into this a bit > later today (hopefully). 8250 changes are enouth for the > serial port to work, parallel port still does not work -- > without the missing patch hunks. My patch was against the -mm tree, and I think one of the differences between 2.5.11 and the -mm tree was the removal of 9835 from parport_pc. Sounds like you've figured that out already :-) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/