Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S266898AbRGMO54>; Fri, 13 Jul 2001 10:57:56 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S266900AbRGMO5o>; Fri, 13 Jul 2001 10:57:44 -0400
Received: from www.transvirtual.com ([206.14.214.140]:1801 "EHLO
	www.transvirtual.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id <S266898AbRGMO5h>; Fri, 13 Jul 2001 10:57:37 -0400
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2001 07:57:20 -0700 (PDT)
From: James Simmons <jsimmons@transvirtual.com>
To: Pim Zandbergen <P.Zandbergen@macroscoop.nl>
cc: David Monro <davidm@amberdata.demon.co.uk>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux Fbdev development list 
	<linux-fbdev-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: IBM E15 framebuffer patch for kernel 2.4.6
In-Reply-To: <0firktsi53rv7qudvo36p8tlvuldk0lbgd@4ax.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10107130755500.30223-100000@transvirtual.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org


> Now the E15 frambuffer patches for kernel 2.2.18 that SuSE use
> (http://www.amberdata.demon.co.uk/carolina/ibm_e15fb.diff.gz)
> won't apply at all to kernel 2.4. And it also seems the
> interface has changed.
> 
> So, has anyone ported this framebuffer code to kernel 2.4?

Never heard of this driver. Thanks for pointing it out. I guess I can take
a look at it. Please note I don't have this hardware.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/