Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262044AbVCZLpE (ORCPT ); Sat, 26 Mar 2005 06:45:04 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262046AbVCZLpE (ORCPT ); Sat, 26 Mar 2005 06:45:04 -0500 Received: from pentafluge.infradead.org ([213.146.154.40]:51366 "EHLO pentafluge.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262044AbVCZLo7 (ORCPT ); Sat, 26 Mar 2005 06:44:59 -0500 Subject: Re: Linux 2.4.30-rc2 From: Arjan van de Ven To: Willy Tarreau Cc: Marcelo Tosatti , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20050326112256.GN30052@alpha.home.local> References: <20050326004631.GC17637@logos.cnet> <20050326112256.GN30052@alpha.home.local> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2005 12:44:53 +0100 Message-Id: <1111837493.8042.2.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.4 (2.0.4-2) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 3.7 (+++) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin version 2.63 on pentafluge.infradead.org summary: Content analysis details: (3.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 1.1 RCVD_IN_DSBL RBL: Received via a relay in list.dsbl.org [] 2.5 RCVD_IN_DYNABLOCK RBL: Sent directly from dynamic IP address [80.57.133.107 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net] 0.1 RCVD_IN_SORBS RBL: SORBS: sender is listed in SORBS [80.57.133.107 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net] X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by pentafluge.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 800 Lines: 20 On Sat, 2005-03-26 at 12:22 +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote: > Marcelo, > > here's a patch from Dave Jones, which is already in 2.6 and which I've > used in my local tree for 6 months now. It removes a useless NULL check > in zlib_inflateInit2_(), since 'z' is already dereferenced one line > before the test. Can in go in 2.4.30 please ? I don't see how such a cleanup-only patch would be a candidate for 2.4 at all, let alone to go into a -rc3 or a 2.4.30 final at this stage... Can you explain why this one is so important that it has to go in so late? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/