Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261197AbVCZRwa (ORCPT ); Sat, 26 Mar 2005 12:52:30 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261200AbVCZRwa (ORCPT ); Sat, 26 Mar 2005 12:52:30 -0500 Received: from anchor-post-36.mail.demon.net ([194.217.242.86]:38665 "EHLO anchor-post-36.mail.demon.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261197AbVCZRw0 (ORCPT ); Sat, 26 Mar 2005 12:52:26 -0500 Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2005 17:52:20 +0000 (GMT) From: Mark Fortescue To: greg@kroah.com cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Can't use SYSFS for "Proprietry" driver modules !!!. Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1231 Lines: 35 Hi, I am writing a "Proprietry" driver module for a "Proprietry" PCI card and I have found that I can't use SYSFS on Linux-2.6.10. Why ?. I am not modifing the Kernel/SYSFS code so I should be able, to use all the SYSFS/internal kernel function calls without hinderence. In order to be able to use SYSFS to debug the driver during development the way I would like to be able to do, I will have to temporally change the module licence line to "GPL". When the development is finnished I will then need to remove all the code that accesses the SYSFS stuf in the Kernel and change the module back to a "Proprietry" licence in order to comply with other requirements. This will then hinder any debugging if future issues arise. I believe that this sort of idiocy is what helps Microsoft hold on to its manopoly and as shuch hinders hardware/software development in all areas and should be chanaged in a way that promotes diversified software development. Regards Mark Fortescue. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/