Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261499AbVC0B3Z (ORCPT ); Sat, 26 Mar 2005 20:29:25 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261504AbVC0B3Z (ORCPT ); Sat, 26 Mar 2005 20:29:25 -0500 Received: from mustang.oldcity.dca.net ([216.158.38.3]:53463 "HELO mustang.oldcity.dca.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S261499AbVC0B3U (ORCPT ); Sat, 26 Mar 2005 20:29:20 -0500 Subject: Re: Can't use SYSFS for "Proprietry" driver modules !!!. From: Lee Revell To: Aaron Gyes Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <1111886147.1495.3.camel@localhost> References: <1111886147.1495.3.camel@localhost> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2005 20:29:19 -0500 Message-Id: <1111886959.1312.19.camel@mindpipe> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.1.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1054 Lines: 25 On Sat, 2005-03-26 at 17:15 -0800, Aaron Gyes wrote: > > So, the fact that someone else is doing something illegal, makes it > > acceptable for you to do the same thing? Please, talk to a lawyer > > about > > this issue if you have _any_ questions. > > How is what they are doing illegal? How it is even "bad"? They obviously > can't give up their IP. Many kernel developers feel that when people use their GPL'ed Linux code with the binary drivers they are giving up their IP to Nvidia. That argument is no less valid than Nvidia's. Only a lawyer can answer the first question, and AFAIK there is not much precedent in the area so it's especially important to get legal advice. One would think Nvidia and ATI got the green light from their lawyers before releasing the binary drivers, so who knows. Lee - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/