From: Norberto Bensa <nbensa@gmx.net>
Organization: =?iso-8859-1?q?inform=E1tica?= BeNSA
To: "Barry K. Nathan" <barryn@pobox.com>
Subject: Re: BK snapshots removed from kernel.org?
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2005 12:26:47 -0300
User-Agent: KMail/1.8
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
References: <200503271414.33415.nbensa@gmx.net> <20050327210218.GA1236@ip68-4-98-123.oc.oc.cox.net>
In-Reply-To: <20050327210218.GA1236@ip68-4-98-123.oc.oc.cox.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200503281226.48146.nbensa@gmx.net>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1046
Lines: 29

Barry K. Nathan wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 27, 2005 at 02:14:33PM -0300, Norberto Bensa wrote:
> [quote rewrapped to keep it within 80 columns]
>
> > Why were snapshots (-bk) removed from www.kernel.org? I can't see any
> > relevant post in LKML.
>
> You can still get to the snapshots using this URL, but as I said, the
> scripts are confused right now:
> http://kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/snapshots/

Hm. No. I mean there are no more testing-bk snapshots. For example. I can't 
find 2.6.12-rc1-bk2.bz2; I have downloaded it on Saturday, but I can't find 
testing bk snapshots anymore. Is this what you are referring as "scripts are 
confused"? Or am I obliged to use bitkeeper from now on?

Many thanks,
Norberto

-- 
Norberto Bensa
inform?tica BeNSA
4544-9692 / 15-4190-6344
Buenos Aires, Argentina
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/