Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262573AbVC2H2g (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Mar 2005 02:28:36 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262572AbVC2H22 (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Mar 2005 02:28:28 -0500 Received: from pentafluge.infradead.org ([213.146.154.40]:38816 "EHLO pentafluge.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262527AbVC2HQ0 (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Mar 2005 02:16:26 -0500 Subject: Re: [ubuntu-hardened] Re: Collecting NX information From: Arjan van de Ven To: John Richard Moser Cc: Brandon Hale , ubuntu-hardened@lists.ubuntu.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <4248828B.20708@comcast.net> References: <42484B13.4060408@comcast.net> <1112035059.6003.44.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> <4248520E.1070602@comcast.net> <1112036121.6003.46.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> <424857B0.4030302@comcast.net> <1112043246.10117.5.camel@localhost.localdomain> <4248828B.20708@comcast.net> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 09:16:20 +0200 Message-Id: <1112080581.6282.1.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.4 (2.0.4-2) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 3.7 (+++) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin version 2.63 on pentafluge.infradead.org summary: Content analysis details: (3.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 1.1 RCVD_IN_DSBL RBL: Received via a relay in list.dsbl.org [] 2.5 RCVD_IN_DYNABLOCK RBL: Sent directly from dynamic IP address [80.57.133.107 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net] 0.1 RCVD_IN_SORBS RBL: SORBS: sender is listed in SORBS [80.57.133.107 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net] X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by pentafluge.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 697 Lines: 21 > > You need to consider that in the end I'd need PT_GNU_STACK to do > everything PaX wants why? Why not have independent flags for independent things? That way you have both cleanness of design and you don't break anything. > The point is > to not break anything, yet to still make things easier for those > projects and distributions like Hardened Ubuntu. to achieve that you need to get the toolchain to omit this stuff automatically somehow. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/