Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 13 Jul 2001 20:31:59 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 13 Jul 2001 20:31:49 -0400 Received: from weta.f00f.org ([203.167.249.89]:18819 "HELO weta.f00f.org") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Fri, 13 Jul 2001 20:31:40 -0400 Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2001 12:31:41 +1200 From: Chris Wedgwood To: Marcelo Tosatti Cc: Linus Torvalds , lkml , linux-mm@kvack.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] VM statistics code Message-ID: <20010714123141.A6119@weta.f00f.org> In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.18i X-No-Archive: Yes Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jul 13, 2001 at 07:53:12PM -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote: Maybe. Personally I don't really care about the way we are doing this, as long as I can get the information. I can add /proc/vmstat easily if needed... How about something under advance kernel hacking options of wherever the sysrq options is? (and profiling used to live, before it was always there), or, since the code is rather small, we could perhaps always have this available. Well, I don't want to include this stuff on the stock vmstat code right now. I've done an ugly hack in vmstat.c to get the thing to work and thats it. Fair enough, but the comment "please apply" makes me nervous then :) --cw - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/