Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262237AbVC2LtM (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Mar 2005 06:49:12 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262239AbVC2LtM (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Mar 2005 06:49:12 -0500 Received: from linux01.gwdg.de ([134.76.13.21]:1770 "EHLO linux01.gwdg.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262237AbVC2LrD (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Mar 2005 06:47:03 -0500 Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 13:46:44 +0200 (MEST) From: Jan Engelhardt To: Arjan van de Ven cc: Lee Revell , Steven Rostedt , Arun Srinivas , nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au, LKML Subject: Re: sched_setscheduler() and usage issues ....please help In-Reply-To: <1112096597.6282.50.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> Message-ID: References: <1112071215.3691.27.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1112071867.19014.30.camel@mindpipe> <1112096597.6282.50.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 746 Lines: 21 >FC2 has this. Even FC1 had it, and I'd not be surprised if even RHL9 had >this. I'd be very susprised if SuSE 9.1 doesn't have it either. It was introduced with SUSE Linux 9.1. But, as usually, I usually do not care for new packages when updating, and schedutils was not a dependency, so it lost itself until I actively checked what it's about when the boot process says "Setting scheduling timeslices unused" Jan Engelhardt -- No TOFU for me, please. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/