Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261519AbVC2VaC (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Mar 2005 16:30:02 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261483AbVC2V3j (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Mar 2005 16:29:39 -0500 Received: from mx01.cybersurf.com ([209.197.145.104]:14526 "EHLO mx01.cybersurf.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261452AbVC2V0M (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Mar 2005 16:26:12 -0500 Subject: Re: [Patch] net: fix build break when CONFIG_NET_CLS_ACT is not set From: jamal Reply-To: hadi@cyberus.ca To: Neil Horman Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" , netdev In-Reply-To: <20050329211741.GL22447@hmsendeavour.rdu.redhat.com> References: <20050329202506.GI22447@hmsendeavour.rdu.redhat.com> <1112130720.1076.112.camel@jzny.localdomain> <20050329211741.GL22447@hmsendeavour.rdu.redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: jamalopolous Message-Id: <1112131560.1079.115.camel@jzny.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.2 Date: 29 Mar 2005 16:26:00 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 845 Lines: 22 On Tue, 2005-03-29 at 16:17, Neil Horman wrote: > No worries. What exactly is the point of contention on netdev? (I'm not > currently following that list). My patch seems to follow the common practice > for CONFIG_NET_CLS_ACT, in that all references to the action member of the > appropriate struct are themselves ifdef-ed. We are trying to kill appearance of any #ifdef CONFIG_NET_CLS_ACT in the classifiers. The patch you sent is correct except it will introduce an ifdef that we are trying to kill. The current workaround is to turn on CONFIG_NET_CLS_ACT in the kernel build. cheers, jamal - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/