Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 14 Jul 2001 07:43:18 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 14 Jul 2001 07:43:07 -0400 Received: from polypc17.chem.rug.nl ([129.125.25.92]:60801 "EHLO polypc17.chem.rug.nl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 14 Jul 2001 07:42:58 -0400 Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2001 13:42:46 +0200 (CEST) From: "J.R. de Jong" To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: 2.4.x swap >= 2*memsize requirement status. Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi all, I noticed that among fellow linux users there is much confusion about the 2.4.x swap requirement. Some heard that it is a _requirement_ to have >= 2*memsize swap or none at all, and others heard that it is advisory in the sense that performance/stability wil drop drastically when one does not take this advice to heart. There was a heated debate about the wisdom of the supposed requirement, especially since many found it to be a major drawback compared to the 2.2.x series. However, I think there is a need for clarity on the real status of the issue. Which brings me to my question: Can anyone shed some light on how 'required' this requirement really is and what one could expect to happen when this requirement is not met? Regards, Johan de Jong. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/