Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261833AbVC3JqR (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Mar 2005 04:46:17 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261831AbVC3JqQ (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Mar 2005 04:46:16 -0500 Received: from gprs189-60.eurotel.cz ([160.218.189.60]:13229 "EHLO amd.ucw.cz") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261830AbVC3JqJ (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Mar 2005 04:46:09 -0500 Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 11:45:55 +0200 From: Pavel Machek To: Lee Revell Cc: Diego Calleja , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: dmesg verbosity [was Re: AGP bogosities] Message-ID: <20050330094555.GA10364@elf.ucw.cz> References: <16944.62310.967444.786526@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> <20050314083717.GA19337@elf.ucw.cz> <200503140855.18446.jbarnes@engr.sgi.com> <20050314191230.3eb09c37.diegocg@gmail.com> <1110827273.14842.3.camel@mindpipe> <20050323013729.0f5cd319.diegocg@gmail.com> <1111539217.4691.57.camel@mindpipe> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1111539217.4691.57.camel@mindpipe> X-Warning: Reading this can be dangerous to your mental health. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1569 Lines: 34 Hi! > > > I'm really not trolling, but I suspect if we made the boot process less > > > verbose, people would start to wonder more about why Linux takes so much > > > longer than XP to boot. > > > > By the way, Microsoft seems to be claiming that boot time will be reduced to the half > > with Longhorn. While we already know how ms marketing team works, 50% looks > > like a lot. Is there a good place to discuss what could be done in the linuxland to > > improve things? It doesn't looks like a couple of optimizations will be enought... > > > > Yup, many people on this list seem unaware but read the XP white papers, > then try booting it side by side with Linux. They put some serious, > serious engineering into that problem and came out with a big win. > Screw Longhorn, we need improve by 50% to catch up to what they can do > NOW. > > The solution is fairly well known. Rather than treating the zillions of > disk seeks during the boot process as random unconnected events, you Heh, we actually tried that at SuSE and yes, eliminating seeks helps a bit, but no, it is not magicall cure you'd want it to be. Only solution seems to be "do less during boot". Pavel -- People were complaining that M$ turns users into beta-testers... ...jr ghea gurz vagb qrirybcref, naq gurl frrz gb yvxr vg gung jnl! - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/