Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262412AbVC3TqW (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Mar 2005 14:46:22 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262415AbVC3TqV (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Mar 2005 14:46:21 -0500 Received: from lirs02.phys.au.dk ([130.225.28.43]:39656 "EHLO lirs02.phys.au.dk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262412AbVC3Toz (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Mar 2005 14:44:55 -0500 Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 20:44:42 +0100 (MET) From: Esben Nielsen To: Steven Rostedt Cc: Ingo Molnar , LKML Subject: Re: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.12-rc1-V0.7.41-07 In-Reply-To: <1112201194.3691.128.camel@localhost.localdomain> Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-DAIMI-Spam-Score: 0 () Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 654 Lines: 23 On Wed, 30 Mar 2005, Steven Rostedt wrote: > [...] > > Heck, I'll make it bloat city till I get it working, and then tone it > down a little :-) And maybe later we can have a better solution for the > BKL. > What about removing it alltogether? Seriously, how much work would it be to simply remove it and go in and make specific locks in all those places the code can't compile? Esben > -- Steve > > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/