Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261852AbVC3VCe (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Mar 2005 16:02:34 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261563AbVC3VAj (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Mar 2005 16:00:39 -0500 Received: from bernache.ens-lyon.fr ([140.77.167.10]:4574 "EHLO bernache.ens-lyon.fr") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261686AbVC3U6x (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Mar 2005 15:58:53 -0500 Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 22:58:37 +0200 From: Benoit Boissinot To: Andrew Morton Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [2.6.12-rc1-mm3] BUG: atomic counter underflow in smbfs Message-ID: <20050330205837.GF10278@ens-lyon.fr> References: <20050330201818.GA18967@ens-lyon.fr> <20050330124456.3da2a2b8.akpm@osdl.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050330124456.3da2a2b8.akpm@osdl.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i X-Spam-Report: * 1.1 NO_DNS_FOR_FROM Domain in From header has no MX or A DNS records Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1930 Lines: 47 On Wed, Mar 30, 2005 at 12:44:56PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > Benoit Boissinot wrote: > > > > I had the following BUG with 2.6.12-rc1-mm3: > > > > remote host is running 2.6.12-rc1-mm1 with samba 3.0.13. > > > > [23156.357178] smb_lookup: find musique/Pink_Floyd-Dark_Side_of_the_Moon > > failed, error=-512 > > [23157.057501] BUG: atomic counter underflow at: > > [23157.057508] [] dump_stack+0x17/0x20 > > [23157.057516] [] smb_rput+0x51/0x60 [smbfs] > > [23157.057530] [] smb_proc_query_cifsunix+0x77/0xa0 [smbfs] > > [23157.057538] [] smb_newconn+0x2bc/0x310 [smbfs] > > [23157.057546] [] smb_ioctl+0xfc/0x100 [smbfs] > > [23157.057554] [] do_ioctl+0x48/0x70 > > [23157.057559] [] vfs_ioctl+0x59/0x1b0 > > [23157.057563] [] sys_ioctl+0x39/0x60 > > [23157.057582] [] sysenter_past_esp+0x54/0x75 > > Oh dear. That warning is not necessarily telling us that there's a serious > problem - often it's fairly harmless. Did the filesytem misbehave in any > other manner? > It was stucked (couldn't do anything inside) but i was able to umount it. > A problem we have here is that nobody really maintains smbfs any more, and > it has problems. I was hoping that the stock answer to that would be "use > cifs", but for some reason that doesn't seem to be happening. Have you > tried it? (Last time I looked, cifs didn't work against win98 servers - > maybe that got fixed). > > Ok, i think i will google a bit to find how to use samba as a cifs server. Thanks, Benoit -- powered by bash/screen/(urxvt/fvwm|linux-console)/gentoo/gnu/linux OS - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/