Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262535AbVCaBcq (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Mar 2005 20:32:46 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262505AbVCaBcq (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Mar 2005 20:32:46 -0500 Received: from ylpvm15-ext.prodigy.net ([207.115.57.46]:60298 "EHLO ylpvm15.prodigy.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262535AbVCaBc2 (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Mar 2005 20:32:28 -0500 From: David Brownell To: Lee Revell Subject: Re: 2.6.11, USB: High latency? Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 17:32:28 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.1 Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <200503301457.35464.david-b@pacbell.net> <200503301713.19920.david-b@pacbell.net> <1112232086.19975.30.camel@mindpipe> In-Reply-To: <1112232086.19975.30.camel@mindpipe> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200503301732.28198.david-b@pacbell.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 634 Lines: 16 > > Please don't assume everyone subscribes to LKML, or that > > everything crafted to be threaded more-or-less-correctly > > was really crafted with any kind of "reply" command. :) > > Um, that's exactly why reply-to-all should be used, There you go, assuming that there was a message to which a "reply-to-all" would apply. MARC, like many archives, doesn't provide such a CC list. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/