Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 18:39:57 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
To: Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com>
Cc: trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no, mingo@elte.hu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: NFS client latencies
Message-Id: <20050330183957.2468dc21.akpm@osdl.org>
In-Reply-To: <1112236017.26732.4.camel@mindpipe>
References: <1112137487.5386.33.camel@mindpipe>
	<1112138283.11346.2.camel@lade.trondhjem.org>
	<1112192778.17365.2.camel@mindpipe>
	<1112194256.10634.35.camel@lade.trondhjem.org>
	<20050330115640.0bc38d01.akpm@osdl.org>
	<1112217299.10771.3.camel@lade.trondhjem.org>
	<1112236017.26732.4.camel@mindpipe>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 663
Lines: 16

Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com> wrote:
>
> > Yes. Together with the radix tree-based sorting of dirty requests,
>  > that's pretty much what I've spent most of today doing. Lee, could you
>  > see how the attached combined patch changes your latency numbers?
>  > 
> 
>  Different code path, and the latency is worse.  See the attached ~7ms
>  trace.

Is a bunch of gobbledygook.  Hows about you interpret it for us?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/