Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 14 Jul 2001 13:00:51 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 14 Jul 2001 13:00:41 -0400 Received: from weta.f00f.org ([203.167.249.89]:30851 "HELO weta.f00f.org") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Sat, 14 Jul 2001 13:00:27 -0400 Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2001 05:00:29 +1200 From: Chris Wedgwood To: Jonathan Lundell Cc: Alan Cox , Andrew Morton , Andreas Dilger , "Albert D. Cahalan" , Ben LaHaise , Ragnar Kjxrstad , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mike@bigstorage.com, kevin@bigstorage.com, linux-lvm@sistina.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] 64 bit scsi read/write Message-ID: <20010715050029.C6963@weta.f00f.org> In-Reply-To: <20010715025001.B6722@weta.f00f.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.18i X-No-Archive: Yes Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Jul 14, 2001 at 08:41:52AM -0700, Jonathan Lundell wrote: NetApp uses a large system-local NVRAM buffer, do they not? Yes... and for clusters its chared via some kind of NUMA interconnect. Anyhow, thats doesn't prevent disk/fs corruption alone, I suspect it might be one of the reasons they use raid4 and not raid5 (plus they also get better LVM management). --cw - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/