Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261442AbVCaPkR (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 Mar 2005 10:40:17 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261495AbVCaPkR (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 Mar 2005 10:40:17 -0500 Received: from ns9.hostinglmi.net ([213.194.149.146]:40125 "EHLO ns9.hostinglmi.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261442AbVCaPkK (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 Mar 2005 10:40:10 -0500 Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 17:40:39 +0200 From: DervishD To: Jesper Juhl Cc: Mariusz Mazur , Linux-kernel Subject: Re: linux-libc-headers scsi headers vs libc scsi headers Message-ID: <20050331154039.GB6468@DervishD> Mail-Followup-To: Jesper Juhl , Mariusz Mazur , Linux-kernel References: <20050330162114.GA1028@DervishD> <200503302240.08200.mmazur@kernel.pl> <20050331074526.GA8614@DervishD> <200503311426.48435.mmazur@kernel.pl> <20050331141726.GA654@DervishD> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Organization: DervishD X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - ns9.hostinglmi.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - vger.kernel.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - dervishd.net X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1184 Lines: 29 Hi Jesper :) * Jesper Juhl dixit: > > > And I don't see any point in LFS suggesting using raw kernel > > > headers to compile glibc > > I don't know their reasons because I haven't read any rationale > > (if any exists at all). Anyway, I've used LLH (including the scsi > http://uwsg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0007.3/0587.html seems to have a > bearing on what you are discussing - just FYI. Not exactly. My doubt is not about whether use symlinks to linux and asm in the linux kernel or not, is about using what glibc people prefer or seem to prefer (raw kernel headers) or using llh. I know that I don't have to use the current kernel headers in /usr/include, but the ones used when compiling my libc or (better) llh. Thanks anyway :) Ra?l N??ez de Arenas Coronado -- Linux Registered User 88736 http://www.dervishd.net & http://www.pleyades.net/ It's my PC and I'll cry if I want to... - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/