Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261619AbVCaSjO (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 Mar 2005 13:39:14 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261647AbVCaSjO (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 Mar 2005 13:39:14 -0500 Received: from quark.didntduck.org ([69.55.226.66]:58861 "EHLO quark.didntduck.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261619AbVCaSjJ (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 Mar 2005 13:39:09 -0500 Message-ID: <424C43FF.3050107@didntduck.org> Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 13:39:59 -0500 From: Brian Gerst User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Emmanuel Papirakis CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: off topic: GPL and binary modules References: <11ad0fa80503311026536d9db2@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <11ad0fa80503311026536d9db2@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 908 Lines: 27 Emmanuel Papirakis wrote: > Hello, > > before I go on, let me say that I did check the FAQ. I also checked > the available archives, but curiously did not find an answer to my > question (so I did Read The Fantastic Manual). > > As you know, most available drivers do come with the source code. But, > still, some come in binary form (often providing just enough code to > make them compliant with new kernel releases). > > Is this a GPL violation ? In any case, what is the official position > on the subject (is this legal or just tolerated) ? > > Thank you > > Emmanuel Search the list archives, this has been flamed to death already. -- Brian Gerst - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/