Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262616AbVDAEiZ (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 Mar 2005 23:38:25 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262617AbVDAEiY (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 Mar 2005 23:38:24 -0500 Received: from shawidc-mo1.cg.shawcable.net ([24.71.223.10]:65394 "EHLO pd4mo1so.prod.shaw.ca") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262616AbVDAEiV (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 Mar 2005 23:38:21 -0500 Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 22:37:44 -0600 From: Robert Hancock Subject: Re: AMD64 Machine hardlocks when using memset In-reply-to: <3O99L-40N-9@gated-at.bofh.it> To: linux-kernel Message-id: <424CD018.5000005@shaw.ca> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Accept-Language: en-us, en References: <3NTHD-8ih-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <3O99L-40N-9@gated-at.bofh.it> User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1001 Lines: 25 Stelian Pop wrote: > Just a thought: does deactivating cpufreq change anything ? > > I haven't tested yet your program, but on my Asus K8NE-Deluxe very > strange things happen if cpufreq/powernow is activated *and* > the cpu frequency is changed... Didn't change anything for me, I tried deactivating cpufreq, still crashes when I run that test program. This is getting pretty ridiculous.. I've tried memory timings down to the slowest possible, ran Memtest86 for 4 passes with no errors, and it's been stable in Windows for a few months now. Still something is blowing up in Linux with this test though.. -- Robert Hancock Saskatoon, SK, Canada To email, remove "nospam" from hancockr@nospamshaw.ca Home Page: http://www.roberthancock.com/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/