Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2005 12:17:23 +0200
From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?J=F6rn?= Engel <joern@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de>
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
Cc: Roland Dreier <roland@topspin.com>, Yum Rayan <yum.rayan@gmail.com>,
       linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mvw@planets.elm.net
Subject: Re: Stack usage tasks
Message-ID: <20050401101723.GA4107@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de>
References: <df35dfeb05033023394170d6cc@mail.gmail.com> <20050331150548.GC19294@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de> <20050331203010.GF3185@stusta.de> <52ll83mtqd.fsf@topspin.com> <20050331211941.GJ3185@stusta.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <20050331211941.GJ3185@stusta.de>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 923
Lines: 29

On Thu, 31 March 2005 23:19:41 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> 
> J?rn, can you send a list of call paths with a stack usage > 3kB when 
> compiling with gcc 3.4 and unit-at-a-time (or tell me how to generate 
> these lists)?

I'll do a spin over the weekend.

If you want to generate the lists, you can either join IBM, deal with
their lawyers or rewrite the checker [1].

> If fixing a handful of places was sufficient, it was IMHO worth it for 
> enabling unit-at-a-time with gcc 3.4 .

Absolutely.  Even if it required more work, it might be worth it,
eventually.

[1] http://wh.fh-wedel.de/~joern/quality.pdf

J?rn

-- 
I don't understand it. Nobody does.
-- Richard P. Feynman
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/