Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262725AbVDAM1d (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Apr 2005 07:27:33 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262728AbVDAM1c (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Apr 2005 07:27:32 -0500 Received: from ms-smtp-04.nyroc.rr.com ([24.24.2.58]:17098 "EHLO ms-smtp-04.nyroc.rr.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262725AbVDAM1a (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Apr 2005 07:27:30 -0500 Subject: Re: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.12-rc1-V0.7.41-07 From: Steven Rostedt To: Ingo Molnar Cc: LKML In-Reply-To: <20050401051947.GA23990@elte.hu> References: <1112212608.3691.147.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1112218750.3691.165.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20050331110330.GA24842@elte.hu> <1112273378.3691.228.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20050331141040.GA2544@elte.hu> <1112290916.12543.19.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20050331174927.GA11483@elte.hu> <1112317173.28076.10.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20050401044307.GB22753@elte.hu> <1112332426.28076.21.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20050401051947.GA23990@elte.hu> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Kihon Technologies Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2005 07:27:25 -0500 Message-Id: <1112358445.28076.23.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.4 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1302 Lines: 30 On Fri, 2005-04-01 at 07:19 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > * Steven Rostedt wrote: > > > > could you send me your latest patch for the bit-spin issue? My main > > > issue was cleanliness, so that the patch doesnt get stuck in the -RT > > > tree forever. > > > > I think that's the main problem. Without changing the design of the > > ext3 system, I don't think there is a clean patch. The implementation > > that I finally settled down with was to make the j_state and > > j_journal_head locks two global locks. I had to make a few > > modifications to some spots to avoid deadlocks, but this worked out > > well. The problem I was worried about was this causing too much > > overhead. So the ext3 buffers would have to contend with each other. I > > don't have any tests to see if this had too much of an impact. > > yeah - i think Andrew said that a global lock at that particular place > might not be that much of an issue. > OK, I'll start stripping it out of my kernel today and make a clean patch for you. -- Steve - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/