Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262839AbVDASab (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Apr 2005 13:30:31 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262851AbVDAS3X (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Apr 2005 13:29:23 -0500 Received: from smtpout16.mailhost.ntl.com ([212.250.162.16]:64880 "EHLO mta08-winn.mailhost.ntl.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262847AbVDAS1i (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Apr 2005 13:27:38 -0500 Message-ID: <424D929A.2030801@gentoo.org> Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2005 19:27:38 +0100 From: Daniel Drake User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041209) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "David N. Welton" Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@osdl.org, viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk, helge.hafting@hist.no, opengeometry@yahoo.ca Subject: Re: rootdelay References: <87wtrphuvj.fsf@dedasys.com> In-Reply-To: <87wtrphuvj.fsf@dedasys.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.89.5.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1420 Lines: 41 Hi David, David N. Welton wrote: > [ Please CC replies to me, thanks! ] > > Hi, I was looking at your patch: > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/1/21/132 > > Very small, which is nice. > > I was wondering if there were any interest in my own efforts in that > direction: > > http://dedasys.com/freesoftware/patches/blkdev_wakeup.patch > > which is far more intrusive, and perhaps isn't good kernel programming > style, but, on the other hand, is the optimal solution in terms of > boot time because it wakes up the boot process right when the device > comes on line. > > Since I saw your patch included, it looks like there is interest in > this, and I'd toot my own horn once more before just leaving my patch > to the bit rot of the ages... > > Thanks! As simple as it may be, it's a bit of a shame that we actually need rootdelay as its something that the kernel should do automatically. At the time when we last discussed it, we didn't come up with a better (and safe) way to handle it, but I don't think we considered anything like your implementation. I've CC'd a few people who were involved the last time around to see if they have any input for you. Daniel - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/