Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262961AbVDBARF (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Apr 2005 19:17:05 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262958AbVDBAQP (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Apr 2005 19:16:15 -0500 Received: from fmr23.intel.com ([143.183.121.15]:3307 "EHLO scsfmr003.sc.intel.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262961AbVDAX4y (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Apr 2005 18:56:54 -0500 Message-Id: <200504012356.j31Nuig04242@unix-os.sc.intel.com> From: "Chen, Kenneth W" To: "'Grecko OSCP'" , Subject: RE: Linux Kernel Performance Testing Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2005 15:56:44 -0800 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.6353 Thread-Index: AcU26KV3yozqTxG9SzODljVkCc7ZcQAJUHEA In-Reply-To: <1c55c94505040110224ea1ebb6@mail.gmail.com> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1800 Lines: 34 Grecko OSCP wrote on Friday, April 01, 2005 10:22 AM > I noticed yesterday a news article on Linux.org about more kernel > performance testing being called for, and I decided it would be a nice > project to try. I have 10 completely identical systems that can be > used for this, and would like to get started while I know I have them > for a while. > > However, I wanted to make sure I didn't waste time. My plan was to do > all testing, prerelease, and release kernels from the 2.4, 2.5, and > 2.6 trees, with both lmbench and the Linux Testing Project (LTP) > benchmark suite. Will this help out? Is there anything else a person > should do? With those two benchmarks, and all the kernels I mentioned, > I could be done in about 25 days, at one kernel a machine a day. I > assume it wouldn't matter what distribution was used, so long as its > the same for all tests? The 10 machines for running benchmarks is not a bad infrastructure to start with. However, it may not be sufficient to identify performance regression. The benchmarks that show regression in Linux kernel requires huge infrastructure - lots of memory, disks, network and clients. The simple benchmarks sometime do not show regression and are usually well covered by the community and OSDL. As mentioned in another thread, we (as Intel) will take on the challenge to do performance testing on a regular basis. We have fairly extensive hardware mix and infrastructure (large smp/numa box with lots of memory, disk farm, network etc) to really stress the kernel, performance wise. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/