Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 15 Jul 2001 03:10:29 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 15 Jul 2001 03:10:19 -0400 Received: from mout1.freenet.de ([194.97.50.132]:201 "EHLO mout1.freenet.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 15 Jul 2001 03:10:11 -0400 Message-ID: <3B5141A0.2B98693@athlon.maya.org> Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2001 09:09:20 +0200 From: Andreas Hartmann X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.6-ac2 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kernel-Mailingliste Subject: Re: Again: Linux 2.4.x and AMD Athlon Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello all, On Friday 13 July 2001 13:12, Thomas Foerster wrote: > I got only one oops in inode.c (forget the actual line number) > The rest are random application crashes on XFree 4.0.3 (GeForce2 GTS, nVidi > DRI (older version)) The System NEVER hangs, only applications crash! Some more experiences with AMD and X-related crashes: -> I've an Athlon 800 on a Epox EP7KXA Mobo (686A) with 512MB RAM and no nVIDIA graphics card, but ATI XPERT 2000. I've got similar problems with 2.4.x-kernels and I would be very glad, if the cause could be found. The problem is more than half of a year old! I posted it in this list some time ago (more than once) - nobody seemed to be interested. I posted it 2 times to the X bug list - no interest. But as I can see now, the problem seems to be greater than I thoght. Therefore I write here some of my latest experiences: # X 4.1 (if I remember right) and 2.4.6 -> a lot off solid crashes (even pinging the machine didn't work) while starting X, no matter if DRI was turned on or off; no matter if agp was loaded or not. Unuseable. # X-CVS and 2.4.6ac2 eg. is working fine - with DRI turned on - I didn't test it without DRI. # Before, I tried to run X 4.1 and ac-Kernels. They have been crashing too as described above. That's why I'm using X CVS. # If I try to run X CVS and vanilla 2.4.6, I'm getting blinking screens after some restarts of X or after long working with X. It's unuseable, too. For me, it seems to be not a nVIDIA related problem. The question for me is: where are the differences between X CVS / X 4.1 and Vanilla / ac-patches - and there combinations. Why is the combination 2.4.6ac2 or the ac-patches before and X CVS (about 4 weeks old; not DRI-CVS; but they have been merged as far as I know) working for me without any problems? Did you try this combination too? It would bee interersting if it would work for you too! Regards, Andreas Hartmann - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/