Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 15 Jul 2001 06:03:54 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 15 Jul 2001 06:03:43 -0400 Received: from pizda.ninka.net ([216.101.162.242]:5248 "EHLO pizda.ninka.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 15 Jul 2001 06:03:29 -0400 From: "David S. Miller" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <15185.27251.356109.500135@pizda.ninka.net> Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2001 03:03:31 -0700 (PDT) To: "George Bonser" Cc: Subject: Re: [PATCH] Linux default IP ttl In-Reply-To: In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: VM 6.75 under 21.1 (patch 13) "Crater Lake" XEmacs Lucid Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org George Bonser writes: > This has reduced considerably the number of ICMP messages where a packet has > expired > in transit from my server farms. Looks like there are a lot of clients out > there running > (apparently) modern Microsoft OS versions with networks having a lot of hops > (more than 64). Why are there 64 friggin hops between machine in your server farm? That is what I want to know. It makes no sense, even over today's internet, to have more than 64 hops between two sites. Later, David S. Miller davem@redhat.com - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/