Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2005 01:01:39 -0800
From: Paul Jackson <pj@engr.sgi.com>
To: Paul Jackson <pj@engr.sgi.com>
Cc: mingo@elte.hu, kenneth.w.chen@intel.com, torvalds@osdl.org,
       nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au, akpm@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] sched: auto-tune migration costs [was: Re: Industry db
 benchmark result on recent 2.6 kernels]
Message-Id: <20050403010139.275b8ece.pj@engr.sgi.com>
In-Reply-To: <20050402215332.79ff56cc.pj@engr.sgi.com>
References: <200504020100.j3210fg04870@unix-os.sc.intel.com>
	<20050402145351.GA11601@elte.hu>
	<20050402215332.79ff56cc.pj@engr.sgi.com>
Organization: SGI
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1092
Lines: 23

Earlier, Paul wrote:
> Note the first 3 chars of the panic message "4.5".  This looks like it
> might be the [00]-[01] entry of Ingo's table, flushed out when the
> newlines of the panic came through.

For the record, the above speculation is probably wrong.

More likely, the first six characters "4.5(0)" of my quoted panic
message came out some time before the panic, and represent the the
[0]-[1] entry of the table.  These six chars came out at approx.
nine minutes into the calculation, and the timer panic'd the system at
ten minutes.  I didn't look at the screen between the 9th and 10th
minute, to realize that it had finally computed one table entry.

-- 
                  I won't rest till it's the best ...
                  Programmer, Linux Scalability
                  Paul Jackson <pj@engr.sgi.com> 1.650.933.1373, 1.925.600.0401
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/