Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2005 16:15:22 -0700
From: Paul Jackson <pj@engr.sgi.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: kenneth.w.chen@intel.com, torvalds@osdl.org, nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au,
       akpm@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] sched: auto-tune migration costs [was: Re: Industry db
 benchmark result on recent 2.6 kernels]
Message-Id: <20050403161522.6e83a231.pj@engr.sgi.com>
In-Reply-To: <20050403142959.GB22798@elte.hu>
References: <200504020100.j3210fg04870@unix-os.sc.intel.com>
	<20050402145351.GA11601@elte.hu>
	<20050402215332.79ff56cc.pj@engr.sgi.com>
	<20050403070415.GA18893@elte.hu>
	<20050403043420.212290a8.pj@engr.sgi.com>
	<20050403142959.GB22798@elte.hu>
Organization: SGI
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 781
Lines: 18

Ingo wrote:
> how close are these numbers to the real worst-case migration costs on 
> that box? What are the cache sizes and what is their hierarchies?
>  ...
> is there any workload that shows the same scheduling related performance 
> regressions, other than Ken's $1m+ benchmark kit?

I'll have to talk to some people Monday and get back to you.

-- 
                  I won't rest till it's the best ...
                  Programmer, Linux Scalability
                  Paul Jackson <pj@engr.sgi.com> 1.650.933.1373, 1.925.600.0401
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/