Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 15 Jul 2001 11:59:07 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 15 Jul 2001 11:58:57 -0400 Received: from mail211.mail.bellsouth.net ([205.152.58.151]:40926 "EHLO imf11bis.bellsouth.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 15 Jul 2001 11:58:43 -0400 Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2001 12:00:14 -0400 (EDT) From: volodya@mindspring.com Reply-To: volodya@mindspring.com To: Adam Schrotenboer cc: lkml , reiser@namesys.com Subject: Re: Stability of ReiserFS onj Kernel 2.4.x (sp. 2.4.[56]{-ac*} In-Reply-To: <3B50DBAE.7030406@lycosmail.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, 14 Jul 2001, Adam Schrotenboer wrote: > Sorry if this is a repost. > > I am upgrading to a new 36GB HD, and intend to split it into 3 pieces: > one 7GB vfat, one ~28GB linux data (reiser or ext2), and 1GB swap. > > I need to know if I can trust ReiserFS, as I do believe that I do want > ReiserFS. Which is a good point - can ext2 handle more than 4gig partitions ? I have some vague ideas that it doesn't (and that it does not handle files more than 2gig long). I am reasonable sure that ReiserFS is better in this regard though I am not certain about this either. Vladimir Dergachev > > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/