Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2005 13:31:29 +0200
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
To: Nigel Cunningham <ncunningham@cyclades.com>
Cc: shaohua.li@intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
       acpi-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, zwane@linuxpower.ca,
       len.brown@intel.com
Subject: Re: [ACPI] Re: [RFC 0/6] S3 SMP support with physcial CPU hotplug
Message-ID: <20050404113129.GA7120@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>
References: <1112580342.4194.329.camel@sli10-desk.sh.intel.com> <20050403193750.40cdabb2.akpm@osdl.org> <1112608444.3757.17.camel@desktop.cunningham.myip.net.au>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1112608444.3757.17.camel@desktop.cunningham.myip.net.au>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1064
Lines: 29

Hi!

> > > The patches are against 2.6.11-rc1 with Zwane's CPU hotplug patch in -mm
> > >  tree.
> > 
> > Should I merge that thing into mainline?  It seems that a few people are
> > needing it.
> 
> Perhaps we should address the MTRR issue first.
> 
> I've had code in Suspend2 for quite a while (6 months+) that removes the
> sysdev support for MTRRs and saves and restores them with CPU context,
> thereby avoiding the smp_call-while-interrupts-disabled issue. Perhaps
> it would be helpful here?

This seems like separate issue... I'd prefer not to block this patch.

MTRRs should be probably handled by some kind of "cpu is going down"
and "cpu is going up" callbacks... Zwane, do you have any ideas?
Linklist of handlers should be enough...

								Pavel
-- 
Boycott Kodak -- for their patent abuse against Java.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/