Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261644AbVDEIhz (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Apr 2005 04:37:55 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261643AbVDEIhz (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Apr 2005 04:37:55 -0400 Received: from smtp3.wanadoo.fr ([193.252.22.28]:32586 "EHLO smtp3.wanadoo.fr") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261664AbVDEIfi (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Apr 2005 04:35:38 -0400 X-ME-UUID: 20050405083537587.8F2931C00C43@mwinf0304.wanadoo.fr Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2005 10:32:17 +0200 To: Ian Campbell Cc: Sven Luther , "Theodore Ts'o" , Greg KH , Michael Poole , debian-legal@lists.debian.org, debian-kernel@lists.debian.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: non-free firmware in kernel modules, aggregation and unclear copyright notice. Message-ID: <20050405083217.GA22724@pegasos> References: <20050404100929.GA23921@pegasos> <87ekdq1xlp.fsf@sanosuke.troilus.org> <20050404141647.GA28649@pegasos> <20050404175130.GA11257@kroah.com> <20050404182753.GC31055@pegasos> <20050404191745.GB12141@kroah.com> <20050404192945.GB1829@pegasos> <20050404205527.GB8619@thunk.org> <20050404211931.GB3421@pegasos> <1112689164.3086.100.camel@icampbell-debian> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1112689164.3086.100.camel@icampbell-debian> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i From: Sven Luther Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1523 Lines: 36 On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 09:19:24AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Mon, 2005-04-04 at 23:19 +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > > > I am only saying that the tg3.c and other file are under the GPL, and > > that the firmware included in it is *NOT* intented to be under the > > GPL, so why not say it explicitly ? > > I don't think anyone here has disagreed. What almost everyone has said > however is "so go and do it" -- go do the research, contact the > copyright holders directly and get the permission to make patches, then > post them here. Ok. I have some doubts about doing the work, and it then being rejected and i did the work first, which is why i asked. It seemed a reasonable thing to ask, and my analysis of the problem was sound, so why didn't i get a, yeah, go ahead, instead of this rejection ? > There is really no point in discussing it here, just get on and do it. As i said, some may know things about relationship, or lack thereof, with the copyright holder, i believe that the people who added those firmware blobs are all reading this here, and it is from them that i wanted feedback, but it failed to produce that effect. /me will investigate bk and how to get the information on who signed those changes off and commited them :) Friendly, Sven Luther - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/