Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261636AbVDEIus (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Apr 2005 04:50:48 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261640AbVDEIur (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Apr 2005 04:50:47 -0400 Received: from smtpout17.mailhost.ntl.com ([212.250.162.17]:5076 "EHLO mta09-winn.mailhost.ntl.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261636AbVDEItb (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Apr 2005 04:49:31 -0400 Subject: Re: non-free firmware in kernel modules, aggregation and unclear copyright notice. From: Ian Campbell To: Sven Luther Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" , Greg KH , Michael Poole , debian-legal@lists.debian.org, debian-kernel@lists.debian.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20050405083217.GA22724@pegasos> References: <20050404100929.GA23921@pegasos> <87ekdq1xlp.fsf@sanosuke.troilus.org> <20050404141647.GA28649@pegasos> <20050404175130.GA11257@kroah.com> <20050404182753.GC31055@pegasos> <20050404191745.GB12141@kroah.com> <20050404192945.GB1829@pegasos> <20050404205527.GB8619@thunk.org> <20050404211931.GB3421@pegasos> <1112689164.3086.100.camel@icampbell-debian> <20050405083217.GA22724@pegasos> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 09:49:25 +0100 Message-Id: <1112690965.3086.107.camel@icampbell-debian> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.4 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1536 Lines: 37 On Tue, 2005-04-05 at 10:32 +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 09:19:24AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: > > On Mon, 2005-04-04 at 23:19 +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > > > > > I am only saying that the tg3.c and other file are under the GPL, and > > > that the firmware included in it is *NOT* intented to be under the > > > GPL, so why not say it explicitly ? > > > > I don't think anyone here has disagreed. What almost everyone has said > > however is "so go and do it" -- go do the research, contact the > > copyright holders directly and get the permission to make patches, then > > post them here. > > Ok. I have some doubts about doing the work, and it then being rejected and > i did the work first, which is why i asked. It seemed a reasonable thing to > ask, and my analysis of the problem was sound, so why didn't i get a, yeah, go > ahead, instead of this rejection ? I don't think you did get a rejection, a few people said that _they_ weren't going to do it, but if you want to then go ahead. I think people are just fed up of people bringing up the issue and then failing to do anything about it -- so prove them wrong ;-) Ian. -- Ian Campbell knghtbrd: there may be no spoon, but can you spot the vulnerability in eye_render_shiny_object.c? -- rcw - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/