Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261692AbVDEKW3 (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Apr 2005 06:22:29 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261691AbVDEKTS (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Apr 2005 06:19:18 -0400 Received: from pin.if.uz.zgora.pl ([212.109.128.251]:16064 "EHLO pin.if.uz.zgora.pl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261692AbVDEKQ6 (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Apr 2005 06:16:58 -0400 Message-ID: <425265EE.6010303@pin.if.uz.zgora.pl> Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 12:18:22 +0200 From: Jacek Luczak User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050322) X-Accept-Language: pl, en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Natanael Copa Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: forkbombing Linux distributions References: <424AE48C.8000805@pin.if.uz.zgora.pl> <1112263230.1165.15.camel@nc> <1112289106.1829.10.camel@mindpipe> <1112694429.32468.27.camel@nc> In-Reply-To: <1112694429.32468.27.camel@nc> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1601 Lines: 48 Natanael Copa napisa?(a): > On Thu, 2005-03-31 at 12:11 -0500, Lee Revell wrote: > > >>Didn't you ever look up what a ulimit is? > > > ofcourse i did. I just think that ulimit (or other userspace tools) > should be used to *raise* the limit if you need more. Not the reverse. > > >>If you consider your distro's default ulimits unreasonable, file a bug >>report with them. But no one is going to make Linux "restrictive by >>default" to make life easier for people who don't bother to RTFM. > > > I already suggested ulimit solutions for my distro. They think that if > this is needed the kernel dev's would do something (ie its a kernel > problem) while the kernel dev's says this is a userspace prob. > > I wouldn't bother if this was a problem for one or two distros only. > Now, almost all distros seems to be vulnerable by default. > > I wouldn't bother if other *nixes would set this limit in userspace. > (the BSD's set the limit lower in kernel and let users who need more > raise with userland tools) > > I wouldn't bother if this wouldn't give Linux a bad reputation. > > I'm Sorry if I made some people upset. > > -- > Natanael Copa > > You have absolutely right!!! Even if 'good' ulimit is set there isn't anything bad in adding ulimit-like mechanism into kernel. Long live ... hmm... kernel, not ulimit:) Best regards, Jacek - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/