Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261892AbVDETAU (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Apr 2005 15:00:20 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261891AbVDES6a (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Apr 2005 14:58:30 -0400 Received: from caramon.arm.linux.org.uk ([212.18.232.186]:37388 "EHLO caramon.arm.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261909AbVDESzN (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Apr 2005 14:55:13 -0400 Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2005 19:55:06 +0100 From: Russell King To: James Bottomley Cc: Matthew Wilcox , "David S. Miller" , SCSI Mailing List , Linux Kernel Subject: Re: iomapping a big endian area Message-ID: <20050405195506.A16617@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> Mail-Followup-To: James Bottomley , Matthew Wilcox , "David S. Miller" , SCSI Mailing List , Linux Kernel References: <1112475134.5786.29.camel@mulgrave> <20050403013757.GB24234@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> <20050402183805.20a0cf49.davem@davemloft.net> <20050403031000.GC24234@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> <1112499639.5786.34.camel@mulgrave> <20050405084219.A21615@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> <1112709915.5764.4.camel@mulgrave> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <1112709915.5764.4.camel@mulgrave>; from James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com on Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 09:05:15AM -0500 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1497 Lines: 38 On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 09:05:15AM -0500, James Bottomley wrote: > On Tue, 2005-04-05 at 08:42 +0100, Russell King wrote: > > Not so. There are two different styles of big endian. (Lets just face > > it, BE is fucked in the head anyway...) > > > > physical bus: 31...24 23...16 15...8 7...0 > > > > BE version 1 (word invariant) > > byte access byte 0 byte 1 byte 2 byte 3 > > word access 31-24 23-16 15-8 7-0 > > > > BE version 2 (byte invariant) > > byte access byte 3 byte 2 byte 1 byte 0 > > word access 7-0 15-8 23-16 31-24 > > These are just representations of the same thing. However, I did > deliberately elect not to try to solve this problem in the accessors. I > know all about the register relayout, because 53c700 has to do that on > parisc. They aren't. On some of our platforms, we have to exclusive-or the address for byte accesses with 3 to convert to the right endian-ness. Sure, from the point of view of which byte each byte of a word represents, it's true that they're indentical. But as far as the hardware is concerned, they're definitely different. See the Intel IXP platforms for an example. -- Russell King Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/ maintainer of: 2.6 Serial core - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/