Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262099AbVDFE3A (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Apr 2005 00:29:00 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262102AbVDFE3A (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Apr 2005 00:29:00 -0400 Received: from orb.pobox.com ([207.8.226.5]:55200 "EHLO orb.pobox.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262099AbVDFE26 (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Apr 2005 00:28:58 -0400 Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2005 23:28:50 -0500 From: Nathan Lynch To: Li Shaohua Cc: lkml , ACPI-DEV , Zwane Mwaikambo , Len Brown , Pavel Machek Subject: Re: [ACPI] Re: [RFC 5/6]clean cpu state after hotremove CPU Message-ID: <20050406042850.GE3611@otto> References: <1112580367.4194.344.camel@sli10-desk.sh.intel.com> <20050404052844.GB3611@otto> <1112593338.4194.362.camel@sli10-desk.sh.intel.com> <20050404153345.GC3611@otto> <1112666106.17861.62.camel@sli10-desk.sh.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1112666106.17861.62.camel@sli10-desk.sh.intel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 723 Lines: 18 On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 09:55:06AM +0800, Li Shaohua wrote: > On Mon, 2005-04-04 at 23:33, Nathan Lynch wrote: > > No. It should make zero difference to the scheduler whether the "play > > dead" cpu hotplug or "physical" hotplug is being used. > Keeping some fields like 'cpu_load' are meanless for a hotadded CPU to > me. Just ignore them? Reinitializing such things during the CPU_UP_PREPARE case in migration_call should be sufficient, if it's not done already. Nathan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/