Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262334AbVDFVjq (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Apr 2005 17:39:46 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262335AbVDFVj3 (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Apr 2005 17:39:29 -0400 Received: from newton.ch.collab.net ([66.146.194.194]:4101 "EHLO newton.ch.collab.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262334AbVDFVjZ (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Apr 2005 17:39:25 -0400 Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2005 16:13:42 -0500 (CDT) Message-Id: <200504062113.j36LDgP42671@newton.ch.collab.net> To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Kernel SCM saga.. References: From: kfogel@collab.net Reply-To: kfogel@collab.net Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 892 Lines: 20 Linus Torvalds wrote: > PS. Don't bother telling me about subversion. If you must, start reading > up on "monotone". That seems to be the most viable alternative, but don't > pester the developers so much that they don't get any work done. They are > already aware of my problems ;) By the way, the Subversion developers have no argument with the claim that Subversion would not be the right choice for Linux kernel development. We've written an open letter entitled "Please Stop Bugging Linus Torvalds About Subversion" to explain why: http://subversion.tigris.org/subversion-linus.html Best, -Karl Fogel (on behalf of the Subversion team) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/