Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262349AbVDFWjg (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Apr 2005 18:39:36 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262344AbVDFWj1 (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Apr 2005 18:39:27 -0400 Received: from parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk ([195.92.249.252]:34510 "EHLO parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262346AbVDFWjR (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Apr 2005 18:39:17 -0400 Message-ID: <42546506.4040000@pobox.com> Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 18:39:02 -0400 From: Jeff Garzik User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.6) Gecko/20050328 Fedora/1.7.6-1.2.5 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: kfogel@collab.net CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Kernel SCM saga.. References: <200504062113.j36LDgP42671@newton.ch.collab.net> In-Reply-To: <200504062113.j36LDgP42671@newton.ch.collab.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 940 Lines: 26 kfogel@collab.net wrote: > Linus Torvalds wrote: > >>PS. Don't bother telling me about subversion. If you must, start reading >>up on "monotone". That seems to be the most viable alternative, but don't >>pester the developers so much that they don't get any work done. They are >>already aware of my problems ;) > > > By the way, the Subversion developers have no argument with the claim > that Subversion would not be the right choice for Linux kernel > development. We've written an open letter entitled "Please Stop > Bugging Linus Torvalds About Subversion" to explain why: > > http://subversion.tigris.org/subversion-linus.html A thoughtful post. Thanks for writing this. Jeff - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/