Subject: Re: Kernel SCM saga..
From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: torvalds@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
In-Reply-To: <20050407015019.4563afe0.akpm@osdl.org>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0504060800280.2215@ppc970.osdl.org>
	 <1112858331.6924.17.camel@localhost.localdomain>
	 <20050407015019.4563afe0.akpm@osdl.org>
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 10:25:18 +0100
Message-Id: <1112865919.24487.442.camel@hades.cambridge.redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 860
Lines: 21

On Thu, 2005-04-07 at 01:50 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> (I don't do that for -mm because -mm basically doesn't work for 99% of
> the time.  Takes 4-5 hours to out a release out assuming that
> nothing's busted, and usually something is).

On the subject of -mm: are you going to keep doing the BK imports to
that for the time being, or would it be better to leave the BK trees
alone now and send you individual patches.

For that matter, will there be a brief amnesty after 2.6.12 where Linus
will use BK to pull those trees which were waiting for that, or will we
all need to export from BK manually?

-- 
dwmw2

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/