Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 16 Jul 2001 07:39:39 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 16 Jul 2001 07:39:28 -0400 Received: from router-100M.swansea.linux.org.uk ([194.168.151.17]:49672 "EHLO the-village.bc.nu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 16 Jul 2001 07:39:17 -0400 Subject: Re: 4.1.0 DRM (was Re: Linux 2.4.6-ac3) To: johnc@damncats.org (John Cavan) Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 12:39:54 +0100 (BST) Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <3B52CEAF.12281126@damncats.org> from "John Cavan" at Jul 16, 2001 07:23:27 AM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL3] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: From: Alan Cox Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Why not do something similar to the aic7xxx driver? Place the old DRM in > code in a pre-X4.1.0 subdirectory, with a warning that it will become > obsolete as of 2.5, and bring in the new code. When you build the > kernel, you can then choose which DRM version you want and everybody is > happy. Thats certainly possible, Ideally you would want both module sets to co-exist. That way the user can build all of DRM and get the right ones loading via modprobe Alan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/