Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262531AbVDGRsF (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Apr 2005 13:48:05 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262532AbVDGRsF (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Apr 2005 13:48:05 -0400 Received: from pimout4-ext.prodigy.net ([207.115.63.98]:12229 "EHLO pimout4-ext.prodigy.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262531AbVDGRsA (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Apr 2005 13:48:00 -0400 Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2005 10:47:47 -0700 From: Chris Wedgwood To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Daniel Phillips , Paul Mackerras , Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: Kernel SCM saga.. Message-ID: <20050407174747.GA9663@taniwha.stupidest.org> References: <16980.55403.190197.751840@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> <200504071300.51907.phillips@istop.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 977 Lines: 27 On Thu, Apr 07, 2005 at 10:38:06AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > So my prefernce is _overwhelmingly_ for the format that Andrew uses > (which is partly explained by the fact that I am used to it, but > also by the fact that I've asked for Andrew to make trivial changes > to match my usage). > > That canonical format is: > > Subject: [PATCH 001/123] [:] > > together with the first line of the body being a > > From: Original Author > > followed by an empty line and then the body of the explanation. Having a script to check people get this right before sending it via email would be a nice thing to put into scripts/ or probably Documentation/ perhaps? Does such a thing already exist? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/