Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262702AbVDHG2t (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Apr 2005 02:28:49 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262704AbVDHG2t (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Apr 2005 02:28:49 -0400 Received: from mx2.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:36798 "EHLO mx2.elte.hu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262702AbVDHG20 (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Apr 2005 02:28:26 -0400 Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2005 08:28:11 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Daniel Walker Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, sdietrich@mvista.com, inaky.perez-gonzalez@intel.com, Steven Rostedt , Esben Nielsen Subject: Re: [PATCH] Priority Lists for the RT mutex Message-ID: <20050408062811.GA19204@elte.hu> References: <1112896344.16901.26.camel@dhcp153.mvista.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1112896344.16901.26.camel@dhcp153.mvista.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-ELTE-SpamVersion: MailScanner 4.31.6-itk1 (ELTE 1.2) SpamAssassin 2.63 ClamAV 0.73 X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-4.9, required 5.9, autolearn=not spam, BAYES_00 -4.90 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamScore: -4 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 604 Lines: 18 * Daniel Walker wrote: > This patch adds the priority list data structure from Inaky > Perez-Gonzalez to the Preempt Real-Time mutex. this one looks really clean. it makes me wonder, what is the current status of fusyn's? Such a light datastructure would be much more mergeable upstream than the former 100-queues approach. Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/